According to manufacturers, diet pills use natural ingredients capable of prolonging life and containing alcohol used in medication or flavoring. One thing’s for sure, never take diet pills as substitute for cutting calories without the doctor’s recommendation. There are simple but important steps to be followed when taking diet pills:

1.Never crush diet pills to mix in drinks or soups. Take it whole with a full glass of water.
2.Diet pills causes a person to urinate more frequently due to its diuretic effect. This could lead to dehydration, thus, causing complications. As a pre-caution, it is best to drink eight glasses of water everyday while on diet pills.
3.Take only the recommended dosage. Taking more than required will not help you lose weight but increase the risk of side effects.
4.Heartbeat should be less than 86 beats per minute. Stop taking the pills if it reaches 90 or higher that is why regular checking of pulse is a must.
5.Always follow the instructions set by the dietician and/or doctor and not only rely on what’s enclosed in the box. Also diet pills will only work as expected if diet plan is being followed.
6.After three months, stop taking the diet pills. Common diet phenylpropanolamine is safe to use only up to sixteen weeks. Other studies show that it can cause health problems if taken under one month.

There are two kinds of diet pills; one is the prescription only diet pills and the over-the-counter diet pills.

Prescription Diet Pills - are drugs regulated by the Food and Drug Administration agency which side effects are monitored, maybe advertised and prescribed under certain dosages. The most popular of these is Xenical, which is licensed for long-term use. However, this too has it’s own side effects, diarrhea, oily and unexpected fecal discharge are just some. Therefore, users are advised to take a low fat diet plan.

While Over-the-Counter Diet Pills are categorized as food substitute and are unregulated. Beware that these diet pills are not Federal authorities tested and may cause serious side effects up to and including death.

Aside from a dietician, local pharmacists can also help in determining the pills that are safe and not for each person’s case. Just be extra careful about the so-called “natural” or “organic” ingredients. Not everything that comes from a natural source is safe. One example is Ma Huang, which is a botanical source of ephedrine known as a stimulant and being studied for potential side effects.

Those who have or have a family history of prostate problems, thyroid disease, mental illness, high blood pressure, and heart problems should avoid taking diet supplements. The same applies to those who’ve had seizures or strokes. If someone is taking cold medicines, especially those with decongestants, diet pills should not be taken. Whether it be a prescription or an over-the-counter diet pill, the dangers are unvarying with other similar drugs which controls the brain to reduce appetite and includes chest pains, hair fall, fever, depression, and even impotence.

And as a general rule, don’t ever try to take diet drugs if pregnancy is suspected. Persons that are allergic to sulfites and tartrazine should also avoid taking diet pills. And those who are under 18 years or over 60 years of age should consult their doctor first prior to taking any dietary drugs, especially if they rely on over-the-counter stimulants used as a replacement for increase exercise.

Summary:

Sudoku Puzzle develops your child's reasoning skills and concentration.

Keywords:

Sudoku Puzzle, Sudoku, Sudoku Tips, Free Sudoku, Mobile Sudoku

Article Body:

Which puzzle gives your brain or your kid's brain the best workout ?

SUDOKU, a seemingly simple numbers game that hails from Japan,

has become the biggest and most addictive puzzle craze on the internet, newspaper, magazines, classrooms and even the mobile phones.

So how good is Sudoku?

The rules are simple, but the game is far from simplistic. An advanced Sudoku could have you scratching your head all day before finally giving up.

But is it the ultimate mind workout, as many believe - or are there better ways to boost your brainpower?

So what Exactly Is SUDOKU All About ?

Sudoku is a mathematical puzzle in a very basic and elementary sense. A solver repeatedly counts and subtracts (working out what is missing from row, column or box) and calculates.

The assertion that 'there is no maths involved' is not only irritating, it is a little ridiculous.

If there is a three there, there can't be a three there, or there, but there could be one there " or there. Or it could be a five.

That sentence would have meant nothing a year ago, but since then, to millions of newspaper readers, including those of this one and its Sunday sister, it has become all too familiar. We have become a nation of Sudoku puzzle addicts.

The instructions are deceptively simple. Fill in the nine-column grid so that every row, every column and every 3 x 3 box within it contains the digits 1- 9.

And no, you don't have to be a mathematician or particularly numerate " The Independent on Sunday runs one based one letters rather than numbers " to do it.

You solve the puzzle with reasoning and logic.

Math skills aren't necessary, although thinking inside the box is.

Sudoku Puzzle develops your child's reasoning skills and concentration.

Reports :

The UK government-produced Teachers magazine has recommended that Sudoku Puzzles are done in the classroom as brain exercise!

Kids gain huge satisfaction from completing a Sudoku puzzle.

There are benefits in playing Sudoku puzzles for the oldies too – as age catching up, the sort of exercise and mental workout which the brain gets from playing logic puzzles can help to stop memory decline, make them smarter and even halt the progress of Alzheimer’s disease .

Get Free Sudoku Puzzles and Learn How To Solve Basic/Advanced Sudoku Puzzles At Your Fingertips

Visit : http://www.interactiventure.com

Summary:

Investigative reporter Donal MacIntyre explores the disturbing rise of the racist and anti-semitic music industry across North America and Europe. MacIntyre discovers 'hate rock' music is attracting young people and has ties to ultra right wing movements."

This is Viking's review of the documentary.

Keywords:

Viking Francesca Ortolani Hate Rock White Power MacIntyre Investigation producer Neil Mackay Five

Article Body:

Another bullet in the cake? No, this time I eat the cake.

I finally saw "Hate Rock" the long awaited - actually 23 hours download - documentary about us. The presentation of the documentary seems much harder than what the video says in reality. Before watching this video I asked for impressions to people who saw it on the cable in the US and all their comments have been very negative. I was caught days ago while answering to some questions on the phone. I classified this documentary as antifascist propaganda, because this is what it seems reading the introduction on the websites (SMG productions and Discovery Times) and this is how people described the show to me. I have to say instead, after watching the work, that it is a "documentary" and not the ultimate show about the "absolute evil".

If I ever missed anything or did not understand anything or if you just want to post a comment (including the expected "go to hell"), you can send a message to my forum (you don't need to register) or to my email address: viking@ashtree.org

Contents

Length limitation (about 1 hour) and lack of time make also the best of the videos a marginal work. You must have asked yourselves: what to include and what to exclude? How to delineate the whole documentary? So, this is the section in which I will list (I will exceed!) your "made 30s, why not 31?", all good advices for someone who'll try to write a book - maybe - about hate rock in future, and I guess many of the things I will write down here were maybe consciously excluded, not just forgotten.

I have seen you pointed your attention to our more or less extreme faces, the "interface", so how music is spread, how concerts are organized, what different images we use, the persecution we get and so on...it's a very good video, but I think sometimes it is too "aesthetic", it often proposes some songs with "impact" lyrics but does not get into their deep meaning, imaging people outside already know about our beliefs (only in Detroit instead you captured a good deal of explanations about some aspects of white power music or when you talked about the 14 words) and sometimes it escapes too much towards descriptions of political organizations forgetting it is a documentary about music and it confines the "white power" movement into the racist thing too much.

Question number one: what is a racist? And on a higher level: what is a nationalist?

It would have been interesting to know how a song is born, in what situation. From the documentary we seem to want ethnic cleaning mostly or only and above all... and you sent my song "Don't go round with the Jews", for instance (I'll take myself as example, because I know myself), which is not a song about that topic, but about the problem of social integration. You chose from my interview my declaration "I say I'm not a nazi, I'm a fascist, I must defend my italian history"... I must comment, with or without that sentence my position doesn't change: I'm a so-called "white power" songwriter anyway, so the statement - extracted from a long discussion - is redundant in this context.

You talked a lot about persecution against our music, absolutely daily life. I think you fully described what happens to our bands and organizers.

Shawn made very clear arguments about it and Erich of Resistance added that music sales help the activities, but what's missing between these parts? It's quite clear that people like the Big Jews or the Communists persecute us (Death to ZOG! People shouted.), but no one clearly expressed some opinions about the reasons. Hegemony for example? What does it mean? What could the interests be? (I'm aware it's impossible to talk largely about it in such a video without falling out of the circle of the topic, but maybe a little idea could be given)

I think the most important reason is implicit, but at the same time fragmented, in your documentary: this kind of music is engine for activities!

Really there are harder crimes than "loving your own folk" in this world, but they are not persecuted. Is recruitment a possible reason for this persecution? You talked a lot about it, but you did not say it is - surely it is - a reason why we are persecuted, or better, there are opposite forces pulling people from other sides into their own gardens.

Very good...In total simplicity you expressed so well the moment "before the concert" in Verona (also in Britain showing true rehearsal). It's direct, it's clear... I'll write more about it later in the editing section. Another good note about the concert in Germany (it was like you were there ready to be arrested together with the skins!).

I saw you noticed how internet increased the sales and the spreading of our music... this is real. Anyway, you didn't investigate about how our music is technically and artistically produced. (You must have seen that artistic production is almost completely missing in this scene!) You showed a recording studio... but what about other solutions, live recordings and...distance recordings? You also talked too little about executive production: if you look carefully you'll find deep gaps among labels! You touched the MTV topic, but which are the requisites for being on MTV? And do we want to be there or are we avoiding? (I personally was on the charts for most downloaded songs on mtv.it...eheh! I'm terrible!)

Or did you ask yourself: in terms of numbers does the white power movement produce and prefer more musically skilled bands or lyrically oriented bands? Which is the balance among these two aspects? (Erich just mentioned something about it) Is there any kind of attempt/effort for an industrial product? Prussian Blue have an organization behind, they "aggressed" the media, they have a tv crew supporting them, a network of advancers...you talked about them, but did not notice this! And how would a music industry based on political groups make difference from current mainstream industries if it takes off? What consequences does it take?

You talked about bands, some in political groups, others external, but which are the differences between a band in politics and a band which is not? Is music more transversal when outside the party?

What about the "fans"? How much do they spend? How do top seller products change according to age, country, income...of buyers?

What about peer-to-peer and how does it damage our scene? How do fans interact and cultivate their interest (forums, mp3-video-photo uploads, blogs and original websites...)?

The Turner Diaries: cutting that part there was place for all these aspects or for another band... I would have chosen Kolovrat or some other band from Eastern Europe.

I appreciated the fact - and now I'll be killed for this - that you didn't mention Ian Stuart so much, but your analysis of "hate rock" has been contemporary.

I liked a lot the line you followed, visiting the concerts and their backstages as self-talking environments.

What's really missing? I'm not the only one who states this: I think you didn't focus at all on the metal scene, such as Burzum (whose cds are sold at your local Virgin Megastore!), or neofolk (I'm considered neofolk, but I'm not one of the exemplary artists who play this genre). You didn't talk about the pagan and christian subcurrents and their struggles (oh, so wrong to have religion and politics together... but this happens!).

And what else... you didn't see there are some professionists who make this music and who are trying their way outside the movement. (I won't nominate, because I'm not sure I am allowed)

I'm sorry to say this final thing, because your work really deserves many honours, but this documentary is still a "flouring" of white power music. I'm very critic about this, yes, like a spinster teacher, because the attempt was really promising and mature this time!

So, sincere congratulations!

My experience on the set and the comments of the old aunts...

I have to award the professionality of those who worked on this documentary, obviously in particular those 3 nice guys I mentioned on "Gloucester Road" (I don't know the others...).

It was not my first time on tv and on press in general. Apart from right-wing press stuff, my relationship with the out-of-the-ghetto press has always been quite stormy...

do you remember, folks, for example, my pics with the bottle or when (on Italian satellite tv) a prestigious reporter aggressed me and cut my hair?

I have to say this time I was treated like a princess. I spoke, answered to questions, I was not aggressed, never interrupted and I have eaten and drunk.

I was shown on the screen like a normal girl with a guitar during a possible ordinary moment of my life - ok, Magnus and Katana are still laughing on the floor saying I walk like a duck. Also all the other people in the video are "men and women".

I received some complaints via email about what I didn't say in the video...

you have to know, sometimes I speak too much and I had promised my close mates of Ashtree things about defence topics and scientific reseach and paganism, because these are important themes in our struggle here at Ashtree Records.

You didn't choose anything of this and ok, it's your choice.

To those who say I'm shown for a too short time on this documentary I reply:

I have always tried to fill my music with hidden messages and now I appear on this video as a subliminal message, so I don't see the problem!

Audience

Some people said your documentary is too British. Well, in my opinion since you are British and the documentary was first produced for Five and then distributed overseas, I think you might have some British audience.

I would like to write down some personal observations and I would like to propose some new hint for reflection and curiosity.

Before investing money on any television production, you must have an idea about the audience to which your product is addressed. It's hard - believe - it's hard to find a man who's got no interest or simply never heard of "hate rock", who sits down in front of the tv and watches a show like this. It's not ignorance... it's a situation like going back home, tired from work and just relax with something pleasant which depends on tastes. You know, television is still not "programmed" by audience (even digital terrestrial, which is sold like "power in the hands of the spectators!") anyway the man, who's God with the Remote Control, could choose a documentary about lions rather than sieg heil sieg heil...

You talked about "arising hate rock". Do you think hate rock is arising alone or is it accompanied by the number of people who are interested in watching your documentary on tv? (Remember, we sell cds because there are fond listeners)

I'll try to be clearer. I have the curiosity to know, whether you considered to produce this video because there are a lot of people who would like to know more about the topic.

Somebody shouted "another jewish thing!"... no, I think, instead, as Orwell's Big Brother teaches, the unwanted truth is hidden! You DO show hate rock, so I see no jewish conspiracy.

MacIntyre

Donal, what kind of name is that? Anyway, I thought MacIntyre was much worst, according to what my nice cooperator from our Press Room Neil Rush said: "George Clooney on holiday". Oh, God, I thought, What is it?

I'm watching from far away Italy. The times I was in Britain I never had the opportunity to see this man in action on tv, so this is my first time. I read his name and I searched on internet. His photos on his website don't make good impression of him as professional figure... I'm not becoming a bigot...

I would like to focus again on the introduction written for this documentary. As I said above it seems a factious introduction, referring to words like "disturbing rise of the racist and anti-semitic music industry". It's true, I should not connect the man with the words reported above, but - this is an advice - pay attention, Mac, because you may fall into the well known tv trap of "kindness", a disease attacking media... nobody's safe!

The history of times has taught: good-looking = kind.

Anyway, Mac, I know you too little to go on discussing this.

I found the location where you spoke adeguate. It was very "hip hop" style and in a certain way "opposed" to white power and since you are an external viewer (I'm not saying you're hip hop or black) the thing unconsciously matched somehow.

I'm sure, I bet 50 pounds, you didn't think about this, but the location was chosen because it was more "streetlife" and more "bad macintyre".

Video & Sound Editing

I cannot say much about filming, because I haven't got the requisites to talk about it, but I can say something about the editing, since it is a bit my cup of tea.

There's not much to say in reality. It's a professional work and done by masters.

I'm a little (some one would rather say "short") beginner - even though somebody has the courage to pay me for editing stuff - but I think I should examine.

I already talked about it, but I should add in this section that the times used to describe the different moments of the Verona event are as precise as a clock.

Sometimes too much "tourism" (indispensable, I don't deny!) cutting time for significative information. A "tourism" like the one in Detroit with explanations of places and local fauna is the good solution.

Sometimes maybe too long zoom in, zoom out on still images and...I don't remember,

I maybe took note about some too slow transition... but those are choices and strategic "fill holes" and pauses, change of rhythm...

The "futuristic" images + music leading to title "Hate Rock" after the introductive speech are like putting Madonna's "American Life" as soundtrack for a documentary about nuns. I don't know if this intro is stylistically in common with other documentaries from your series, but really here it is a punch in an eye.

I think the introductive speech was enough, since it was a sort of well done summary, it could lead to title "Hate Rock" perfectly.

The last 20 minutes of the show are much slower than the first part. Is it my impression?

Too long uncut videos, less movement... in my opinion, after about 40 minutes play, such a video should get a faster rhythm because it's like the audience - I don't want to say it falls asleep - is eating 300g of pasta and after all this food you may get enough of it.

Sometimes different speeches of a same person taken in different places, with too different noise backgrounds, are attached like a continuous speech but the contrast is too evident.

You should have overlapped or attached more carefully or tried to show the video (even half a second, don't need much) from which the environmental noise is taken.

You may wonder "You, right you are telling me this...have you ever seen your own stuff?"

Yes, I have and I don't want to remember.

Summary:

You're About To Learn 'Secrets' That Most People Will Never Know About How To Really Create Wealth Online...

Keywords:

personal development,self improvement,Leadership,Sales,Communication,Internet Marketing,Motivation, real estate, network marketing, home business, make money online

Article Body:

This Program is SCREAMING with Momentum...

"Join My Team Now and I'll Show You How To

Earn Up To $10,000 Per Month by Simply "Giving Away" FREE Education That Helped a Homeless 21 Year-Old Earn $3,244,842.32 In Just 27 Months..."

See Why Over 14,000 People In 146 Countries Have Jumped on Board...

As you probably know, I rarely ever endorse a program through ALL of my advertising outlets. Success University has me so excited though that I'm starting 2006 with ALL GUNS BLAZING!

Here's what I'm going to do when you join me in Success University...

Everyone I enroll in Success University will be positioned down ONE line of my organization... one directly below another, below another, etc.

That means everyone I enroll after you will go below you and will count toward YOUR commissions!

Normally I wouldn't do this but because I would LOVE to see you get 2006 off to a prosperous start, I'm giving you everyone who enrolls after you do!

Now, here's the quick facts about Success University which I believe in 100% and am earning THOUSANDS a month in passive residual income...

In just a few months, Success University has SKYROCKETED past every other personal development site in the world because of their unique Learn & EARN program.

The reason it's EXPLODING around the world is because it's so incredibly SIMPLE...

If you can follow 3 simple steps like I have, YOU can be a success too:

Step 1: Enroll for a 14-Day Free Trial at no cost and receive $1,949 in education with no obligation. Your benefit of joining with me is that I'm going to place a ton of students on your team...

Step 2: Simply follow our simple step-by-step marketing system that helps you "give away" free education to hundreds of people.

(What I'm doing now)

Step 3: Earn residual income on all the students who remain a student of Success University.

Go to my website (www.playsmartonline.biz) now and you can enroll for a 14-Day Free Trial and start making money by the end of the day.

My advice is to drop everything and do this right now because the people who jump on this email first, will get positioned ABOVE those who wait. (And will earn the most money because of the customers I put below you.)

Many people would prefer to watch streaming video free instead of having to pay for it. While at first there are obvious reasons for this, there are other reasons for this type of preference among viewers as well. Yes, there is the obvious desire to save money and to not have to pay money in order to watch something. No one wants to spend money if they do not have to do so. There are many people that will spend much longer looking to find a streaming video free of charge so that they will not have to pay for the items. While some people would argue that the quality of streaming video free of charge options are not as superior as those that are offered on a charge basis, this is not always true. Many people are very happy with the quality of the videos that they are able to receive as a result of streaming video free of charge options that they are able to find. However, one of the better reasons for people watching streaming video free is that they are provided with more options. There are many people that make videos for fun. And they will put their work on the website, and all people to see their streaming video free. This is good for people that want to be entertained and learn something, but this is also good for the person that made the video. When a person puts a video on the internet, some people may want to watch it. However, there are many people that do not want to pay for videos that someone that they do not know created. If a person pays for a video, it will typically be for a genre that they are very interested in, or it will be because they are very interested in the work of the individual – enough so to pay for the work. If a person is new to making videos, they will likely want to offer their streaming video free. This will help to encourage people to view the video, since it will be streaming video free. There are also many more websites on the internet that will offer streaming video free of charge, as opposed to the number of sites that charge. This is simply because when it comes to supply and demand, more people want a streaming video free of charge as opposed to a streaming video that they will have to pay for.

On the television, a person can see a streaming video free when they turn on a basic cable channel. These are the channels that any one can pick up, without paying for them. This is free and the stations are constantly playing the content that the televisions picks up. There is often more variety when it comes to a streaming video free site, since more people will be creative with what they offer. This is because they will not have to fit into a niche in order to be able to entice people to see their work.